RBI releases draft guidelines on ‘Prudential Framework for Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning pertaining to Advances - Projects Under Implementation’
FinTech BizNews Service
Mumbai, May 4, 2024: The Reserve Bank of India has, over the past few years, taken concerted measures for putting in place a principle-based regime for resolution of stressed assets. The Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets issued on June 7, 2019 (‘Prudential Framework’) provides a comprehensive framework for early recognition and resolution of stress in borrower account. However, restructuring of exposures relating to projects under implementation on account of change in date of commencement of commercial operations (DCCO) was excluded from the ambit of the Prudential Framework, pending further review.
2. Based on a comprehensive review of the regulatory norms and the taking into account the experience of banks with regard to financing of project loans, it has been decided to rationalise the extant guidelines and harmonise the same for all regulated entities (REs) which undertake project finance.
3. The revised prudential norms, as consolidated in this Master Direction, are being issued by the Reserve Bank in exercise of the powers conferred by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949; the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; the National Housing Bank Act, 1987; and the Factoring Regulation Act, 2011.
Prudential Conditions for Project Finance
9. Lenders desirous to have project finance exposures shall have a Board-approved policy for resolution of stress in the projects on occurrence of a credit event.
10. For any project, all mandatory pre-requisites should be in place before financial closure. An indicative list of such pre-requisites includes availability of encumbrance free land and/or right of way, environmental clearance, legal clearance, regulatory clearances, etc., as applicable for the project. However, for infrastructure projects under PPP model, land availability to the extent of 50% or more can be considered sufficient by lenders to achieve financial closure.
11. For all projects financed by the lenders, it must be ensured that financial closure has been achieved and DCCO is clearly spelt out and documented prior to disbursement of funds. Additionally, lenders shall ensure that disbursal is proportionate to the stages of completion of the project as also to the progress in equity infusion, as agreed. In case of PPP projects, disbursement of funds should begin only after declaration of the Appointed date of the project. The project specific disbursement schedule vis-à-vis stage of completion of the project shall be prescribed by the lenders. Further, the lender’s Independent Engineer (LIE)/Architect must certify the stages of completion of the project.
12. The dispensations available under this framework shall be available only to those lenders who have extended finance to such project loans based on a common agreement between the debtor and the lender(s).
13. In respect of infrastructure projects under PPP model awarded by a Statutory Authority, the DCCO documented in the financial closure document may be modified to reflect any change in the ‘Appointed Date’ by the Concession Authority prior to disbursement of funds by way of a supplementary agreement between the lender/s and the sponsor subject to reassessment of project viability and obtention of sanction from appropriate authorities. Any change in DCCO after partial or full disbursement of loans shall be subject to provisions of Part J in Chapter 3 of this Direction.
Provided that the lenders shall put in place a framework to engage the LIE and conduct a Techno-Economic Viability (TEV) study to evaluate the estimated expenditure for the project, economic viability, and bankability of these projects.
14. In projects financed under consortium arrangements, where the aggregate exposure of the participant lenders to the project is upto ₹1,500 crores, no individual lender shall have an exposure which is less than 10% of the aggregate exposure. For projects where aggregate exposure of lenders is more than ₹1,500 crores, this individual exposure floor shall be 5% or ₹150 crores, whichever is higher.
15. Notwithstanding the above, post DCCO, lenders may acquire from or sell exposures to other lenders (new/existing) in the multiple banking/consortium arrangements, and in compliance with guidelines contained in the Master Direction on Transfer of Loan Exposures as updated from time to time.
16. The financing agreement shall generally not allow any provision for moratorium on repayments beyond DCCO period and repayment structure shall be realistically designed to factor in the lower initial cash flows.
Provided that, in cases where a moratorium on repayments beyond DCCO is granted, the same shall not exceed six months from the commencement of commercial operations.
17. The original or revised repayment tenor, including the moratorium period, if any, shall not exceed 85% of the economic life of the project.
18. A positive net present value (NPV) is a prerequisite for any Project financed by lenders. Any subsequent diminution in NPV during the construction phase, either due to changes in projected cash flows, project life-period or any other relevant factor which may lead to credit impairment, shall be construed as a credit event. Accordingly, lenders shall get the project NPV independently re-evaluated every year.
Resolution and Prudential Norms
I. Resolution of Stress
19. It is expected that the lenders monitor the build-up of stress in a project on an ongoing basis and initiate a resolution plan well in advance. Occurrence of a credit event, during the construction phase, with any of the lenders in the project finance arrangement, within or outside the consortium, shall trigger a collective resolution in terms of the Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets dated June 7, 2019 (‘Prudential Framework’). The reference to ‘default’ in the Prudential Framework shall be read as ‘credit event’ for the purpose of project finance accounts, unless specified otherwise.
20. Any such Credit Event shall be reported to the Central Repository of Information on Large Credit (CRILC) by the lenders in the prescribed weekly as well as the CRILC-Main report in compliance with the extant instructions, as applicable. Lender(s) in a consortium/MBA shall also report occurrence of such credit event to all other members of the consortium/MBA.
21. All lenders shall undertake a prima facie review of the debtor account within thirty days from the date of such credit event (“Review Period”). For accounts where a credit event is already existent as on the date of these Directions, the review period shall commence immediately. The conduct of the lenders during this “Review Period” including signing of Inter Creditor Agreement (ICA), and the implementation of a resolution plan (RP), where required, shall be guided by the provisions of the Prudential Framework, unless specified otherwise in these Directions.
J. Resolution Plans involving extension of DCCO
22. A resolution plan involving change in DCCO shall be deemed to be implemented only, if all of the following conditions are met:
(i) all required documentation, including execution of necessary agreements between lenders and the debtor / creation of security charge / perfection of securities, are completed.
(ii) the new capital structure and/or changes in the financing agreement get duly reflected in the books of all the lenders and the debtor;
23. A project finance account classified as ‘standard’ in the books of REs shall continue to be classified as ‘standard’ on account of extension of DCCO and consequential shift in repayment schedule for equal or shorter duration (including the start date and end date of revised repayment schedule) under the following conditions:
| Reason for Extension of DCCO | ||
Exogenous Risks | Endogenous Risks | Litigation (Court cases) | |
Allowable deferment of DCCO from the DCCO originally envisaged in the financing agreement | Upto 1 year (including CRE projects) | Upto 2 years for Infrastructure Projects | Upto 1 year (including CRE projects) |
Provided that, the above ‘standard’ asset classification benefit would be subject to satisfaction of all relevant prudential conditions specified in Part H in Chapter 1 of these Directions.
24. In cases where exogenous and endogenous risks materialise together, the longer of the permissible deferments of DCCO as given in para 23 above may be availed of. However, the cumulative deferment of DCCO for any project on account of reasons specified in paragraph ‘b’ above (occurring concurrently or otherwise), shall not exceed 3 years and 2 years respectively for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects (including commercial real estate projects). Extension of DCCO beyond these limits would not qualify for asset classification dispensation.
25. Any change in the repayment schedule of a project loan caused due to an increase in the project outlay on account of increase in scope and size of the project, shall continue to be classified as ‘standard’ if:
(i) The increase in scope and size of the project takes place before commencement of commercial operations of the existing project.
(ii) The rise in project cost excluding any cost-overrun in respect of the original project is 25% or more of the original outlay as the case may be (Illustration given in Annex 1)
(iii) lenders re-assess the viability of the project before approving the enhancement of scope and fixing a fresh DCCO.
(iv) On re-rating, (if already rated) the new rating is not below the previous rating by more than one notch. If the project debt was unrated at the time of increase in scope or size, then it should be rated investment grade upon such increase in scope or size.
Provided that standard asset classification benefit for changes in repayment schedule on account of ‘change in scope’ shall be allowed only once during the lifetime of the project.
26. In cases where lenders have specifically sanctioned a ‘Standby Credit Facility (SBCF) at the time of initial financial closure to fund cost overruns arising on account of extension in DCCO, they may fund cost overruns as per the agreed terms and conditions up to a maximum of 10% of the original project cost.
27. However, in cases where SBCF was not sanctioned at the time of financial closure or sanctioned but not renewed subsequently, lenders may fund cost overruns arising on account of extension in DCCO as per the agreed terms and conditions, up to a maximum of 10% of the original project cost (excluding IDC), provided the additional funding shall be priced at a premium to what would have been applicable on a pre-sanctioned SBCF. Lenders shall ensure that the loan-contracts shall ab-initio specify the additional risk premium to be charged on such SBCF, which may be revised upwards based on actual risk assessment at the time of sanction of such facilities. The additional risk premium shall be subject to a floor of 1.00 per cent.
Provided that the provisions to fund cost overrun in terms of this paragraph shall only be available for infrastructure projects.
28. Post-RP, financial parameters like D/E ratio, DSCR. etc., and external credit rating, if any, shall remain unchanged or enhanced in favour of lenders.
29. If the resolution plan involving change in DCCO is not successfully implemented in terms of paragraph 22 above, within 180 days from the end of review period, conforming to the stipulations laid down in these Directions, then the account shall be downgraded to non-performing asset (NPA) immediately.
K. Criteria for Upgradation
30. Project finance accounts downgraded to NPA under paragraph 29 above can be upgraded after 360 days from the end of Review Period, provided the RP has been successfully implemented, no further diminution in fair value of asset has happened and no further request for DCCO is made.
L. Income Recognition
31. Lenders may recognise income on accrual basis in respect of loans to projects under implementation, which are classified as ‘standard’. In cases involving DCCO deferred accounts which are classified as ‘standard’ and where there is a moratorium on payment of interest and principal, lenders shall book income only on cash basis beyond original DCCO, considering the high risk involved in such accounts. For non-performing accounts, income recognition shall be as per extant instructions contained in Master Circular - Prudential norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning pertaining to Advances dated April 02, 2024, as amended from time to time.
M. Provisioning for Standard Assets
32. All lenders shall maintain provisions on exposures to projects under implementation at various stages as under:
33. Construction Phase: A general provision of 5% of the funded outstanding shall be maintained on all existing as well as fresh exposures on a portfolio basis.
34. Operational Phase: Once the project reaches the ‘Operational phase’, the above provisions specified at paragraph 33 above, can be reduced to 2.5% of the funded outstanding. This can be further reduced to 1% of the funded outstanding provided that the project has (a) a positive net operating cash flow that is sufficient to cover current repayment obligation to all lenders, and (b) total long-term debt of the project with the lenders has declined by at least 20% from the outstanding at the time of achieving DCCO.
N. Provisioning for DCCO deferred accounts
35. For accounts which have availed DCCO deferment as per Part J of this Chapter and are classified as ‘standard’, and wherein the cumulative deferments are more than 2 years and 1 year for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects respectively, lenders shall maintain additional specific provisions of 2.5% over and above the applicable standard asset provision as at paragraph 33 above. This additional provision of 2.5% shall be reversed on commencement of commercial operation.
O. Provisioning for Delayed Implementation of Resolution Plan
36. When a viable RP is not successfully implemented as stipulated under Part I and Part J of this Chapter, as applicable, all lenders shall make additional provisions as prescribed for ‘Delayed implementation of Resolution Plan’ in the Prudential Framework dated June 07, 2019. These additional provisions can be reversed on successful implementation of resolution plan as per paragraph 22 of Part J of this Chapter.
P. Provisioning for Non-Performing Assets
37. Provisioning for non-performing assets shall be as per extant instructions contained in Master Circular - Prudential norms on Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning as applicable to the respective lender, updated from time to time.
Miscellaneous
Q. Creation and Maintenance of Database
38. Project specific data, in electronic and easily accessible format, shall be captured and maintained by lenders on an ongoing basis. A non-exhaustive list of the relevant parameters, which shall form part of project finance database is given in Annex 2 to this Direction. Lenders shall update any change in parameters of a project finance loan at the earliest, but not later than 15 days from such change. The necessary system in this regard shall be put in place within 3 months of the release of these Directions.
R. Regulatory Return and Disclosure
39. For all project finance loans extended, lenders are advised to submit a prescribed return on a quarterly basis, within 15 calendar days from the end of the quarter to our Department of Supervision (DoS). The format for submission shall be notified in the due course.
40. Lenders shall make appropriate disclosures in their financial statements, under ‘Notes to Accounts’, relating to RPs implemented. The format for disclosure is given in Annex 3.
S. Timelines for compliance
41. The provisioning of 5% for Standard Assets during construction phase shall be achieved in a phased manner as per the following timeline:
(i) 2 per cent – with effect from March 31, 2025 (spread over the four quarters of 2024-25)
(ii) 3.50 per cent – with effect from March 31, 2026 (spread over the four quarters of 2025-26)
(iii) 5.00 per cent – with effect from March 31, 2027 (spread over the four quarters of 2026-27)
42. All other provisions of these Directions shall be complied with immediate effect.
T. Penal Consequences for non-compliance
43. Non-compliance with any of the provisions contained in these Directions shall attract supervisory and enforcement action as applicable.
U. Repeal Provisions
44. With the issue of these Directions, the instructions/guidelines contained in Annex 4, stand repealed.
45. Notwithstanding the repeal provisions under paragraph 44 above, anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken, or any direction given or any proceeding taken or any penalty or fine imposed under the repealed enactments shall, insofar as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Master Direction.
For further details: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=4428
